Search Topics

Is it genuine that Chelsea don't have an arena

Does Chelsea have an arena? Is there an opportunity that Chelsea would fabricate another arena? On the off chance that Roman Abromovic keeps...

Does Chelsea have an arena?

Is there an opportunity that Chelsea would fabricate another arena?

On the off chance that Roman Abromovic keeps control of Chelsea FC there is a critical opportunity that the arena overhauls will be dropped or at any rate postponed. Roman has been giving indications as of late that he would rather not keep on emptying limitless assets into the club, while simultaneously having his status in the UK in an in-between state.

While he has acquired an Israeli visa, he doesn't have the lawful capacity to dwell in London full time and carry on with work there. This I accept is providing him opportunity to stop and think with regards to additional interest into the club.

Likewise, because of the exceptionally close environmental elements at Stamford Scaffold, there is almost no space to grow the arena toward any path put something aside for up… This makes the expense of development soar. Almost a portion of a billion GBP were said to have been designated in the financial plan for the task.

This kind of speculation is undeniably challenging to legitimize on the lookout, with truly expanding move costs, dubious media pay, and no assurance of Champions Association pay each season in the extremely serious Head Association.

It is no surpriser to me that this undertaking is being postponed/dropped.

 It's been uncovered as of late that Chelsea FC is proposing to seek after repurchasing the land on which sits our club's arena, Stamford Extension. The land is as of now possessed by a gathering known as Chelsea Pitch Proprietors, or CPO, who bought it during the 1990s when the eventual fate of the arena was up in the air.

In any case, presently, because of Chelsea proprietor Roman Abramovich's "possession and long haul responsibility" to the club, the second-party proprietorship is not generally required.

The buzz, nonetheless, is that this could be a sign to a possible movement of CFC's home ground soon, seeing as the region around the ongoing arena in excessively blocked to just change and redesign Stamford Scaffold as it is currently.

As a fan, I for one don't have a situation on this issue yet, yet the following are three reasons each for leaving and remaining...

One motivation to remain at Stamford Scaffold is the historical backdrop of the scene.

Planned by noted planner Archibald Leitch, the arena was worked in 1877, and was the home of the London Games Club from that year until 1904, when the arena's proprietor, Gus Mears, established Chelsea Football Club to possess the ground.

It initially had a football contribute the center circled by a running track, removing fans from the activity.

The Extension has gone through a few remodels over the last 100 or so years, the most remarkable being after Ken Bates purchased the club in 1982. The ground's track was eliminated, and the arena was transformed into an all-seater field following the Hilllsborough catastrophe of 1989.

Today, the Extension holds very nearly 42,000 observers, who are unquestionably content with their home similarly for what it's worth.

More data on Stamford Extension's set of experiences can be viewed as here.

The Scaffold Is Adequate for Our Necessities

The truth of the matter is, the Extension as it is currently is certainly not a totally unsatisfactory home for our Blues. Indeed, the seating limit isnt as extraordinary as the arenas of a portion of our opponents, yet 42,000 isnt a terrible max limit by any means, taking into account Manchester City's recently constructed arena is just at 48,000 limit.

For point of view, here is the limits of a portion of our opponents' home grounds:

- Old Trafford - 76,000

- Eastlands - 48,000

- Emirates Arena - 60,000

- White Hart Path - 36,000

- Anfield - 46,000

- Goodison Park - 40,000

- Arena of Light - 49,000

- St. James Park - 52,000

- Estate Park - 43,000

Given these numbers, Chelsea is about in the center, intending that in no way, shape or form are we in a must-move circumstance.

Many fans and home-game-regulars say the Extension has something a fresher setting likely never could - air.

There is a sure environment about more established arenas that simply isn't accomplished with fresher constructed ones like Etihad, Emirates and Wembley. There's substantially less person, friendliness and soul with more current arenas, which all appear to be only a major oval of seats with a contribute the center. The Extension has character and a vibe to it that another one could most likely never give.

For instance, contrast Stamford Extension here with the recently fabricated Emirates Arena here. Theres an enormously clear distinction in the two. The cutting edge Emirates seems to be a masterpiece than an arena - where a huge number of fans ought to have the option to go to energetically uphold their club in a climate that feels warm and inviting.

Surrender Stamford Scaffold now, and we might in all likelihood at no point ever get the theoretical things it gives back in the future.

Step Towards What's in store

6 OF 9

One motivation to leave Stamford Scaffold would be that migrating and fabricating another arena would be an immense step into the future for our club.

Clearly, we had a significant redesign in 2003 when it changed proprietorship, and that showed up for whatever might be most ideal. Who's to express moving to another ground couldn't deliver similar positive outcomes?

A portion of our opponent clubs like Stockpile and Manchester City have migrated and moved into fresher, more current arenas with a lot bigger limits than their previous ones, as seen on the left.

Certain individuals might suppose, in the event that Chelsea gets an opportunity to do likewise, we'd be insane not to take it.

Expanded Income

7 OF 9

One more motivation to move to a bigger arena is the expanded income from the extra ticket deals.

Seeing as a transition to another arena is accounted for to mean our club's ground's ability could practically twofold, it would get a colossal increment of cash to subsidize other club drives and assist us with turning out to be more independent.

It would likewise be an or more to the fans, permitting more to visit each home game.

Time for a Change?

Furthermore, the last justification for a move would be that it might simply be the ideal opportunity for a change.

We have magnificent recollections within recent memory at Stamford Scaffold that most fans will always remember, however doesn't part of being a club with a brilliant future incorporate having the option to express farewell to the past?

Eventually, this discussion is probably going to have two rival sides to it for quite a while, taking into account a move isn't logical by any stretch of the imagination before the year 2020.

So what is your take? Would it be advisable for us to remain at Stamford Scaffold, or move to some place new?



CFC - Chelsea Online Newspaper : Is it genuine that Chelsea don't have an arena
Is it genuine that Chelsea don't have an arena
CFC - Chelsea Online Newspaper
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy Table of Content